Technology
changes so fast in this time, and one of the main foci of the communication
research focuses is the effect of technology developments towards individual
communication patterns, like political or civic engagements or real
participation. Honestly, what I believe about academic trend is ‘technology
deterministic’ perspective. Even though I lamented the fact that I was moved
easily by technology, not human, I cannot explain anything without the
involvement of technology.
The
involvement technology in our life means that technology itself forms the
fundamental platform of life. As a researcher, I should realize that academic
interests and academic papers should be concrete; it should not be vague or
ambiguous. When I firstly dipped my feet into academic field, I was asked a lot
about my research interest. I replied that “my research interest is new media.’
How I was naïve! As time went by, I asked myself “so what about new media?”,
“why should I study this?” Luckily, my research interests became concrete and I
became little bit clear (even though I need more improvement), about my
research interests: “the effect of communication technology on political
communication patterns, especially how new opinion leaders stimulate their
neighbors to be engaged in political polarization.’
My
research interests just followed what Gauntlett mentioned about new media
studies at the early 2000. Of course, things have been changed significantly
and research agenda suggested by Gauntlett became old fashioned and little bit
abstract. What we have to do for the future of communication research is that
we should find more on this basic agenda, of course based on the cutting-edge
technology.
No comments:
Post a Comment