The concern about whether consumers are willing to pay for
online content or not has been a hot topic in media economic research. Unlike
traditional media, the nature of online media provides another way to make a profit
rather than asking readers to pay. Cha mentioned the long tail economy to
explain this phenomenon.
Three forces of the long tail
economy are “more producers/content”, which extends the tail to the right, “the
low cost of distribution”, and “more access to niches.” (Anderson, 2006). Those
three characteristics of online media are very different from traditional
media, and they provide a way for online media to make a profit.
Social Network Sites (SNS) collect
users’ content, and they can monetize this content. That is, syndication is a
major source of revenue for SNS. When
more content generated by users brings in more revenue, then the SNS can
provide better service. This will attract more users which in turn can the site
attract more advertisers. In this sense, users are not using a free service.
They produce content that SNS uses to make a profit.
Another way that online media make
money is due to low cost of distribution. Users distribute their messages without spending a penny. Compared to traditional
media, it probably cost SNS less to reach target customers for
advertisers. The lower the cost, the
larger the profit. Once SNS can reach a more precise target market than
traditional media, why can SNS not make a more profit than traditional media?
The third force of long tail economy is “more access to niche.” It is easier for online media to target a niche
market than traditional media. What I think interesting is not about how much
niche market can online media have. What amazing is no matter how small that
market is can support the survival of online media. Like Cha mentioned in the
article, Facebook derives more revenue from niche markets than from hit
markets. What I am thinking is that can traditional media rely on small market,
just like SNS do?
Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future
of business is selling less of more. New York, NY: Hyperion.
No comments:
Post a Comment